Friday, December 13, 2013

Animation Links - Whitney

Here are a few links I mentioned in our last class about animations and Flash. Please look at these amazing works when you get the chance!

Origami - ESMA



ShazamBlast -Youtube

She is the animator, the youtuber this is from is the one she gets the audio from and then draws the animation based off of the videos he posts. This is the video in its completion. 


She then makes on her youtube site, tutorials and quick walkthroughs of how she creates these animations in Flash Pro. 



Have a wonderful break everyone! <3


Reading Responses - Whitney Ratliff


I understand that I have neglected the online responses for the class but due to the obsessive workload I have had this semester as well as my lack of interest in forum type websites, I have decided to submit everything in bulk. 



Week 2:

Culture Intercom - Stan Vanderbeek

Vanderbeek’s concept of the “Culture Intercom” is rather an interesting take on the growing, evolutional process of technology and using it to one’s advance for the sake of expanded cinema in many different ways to help better understand the the purpose and effect of the image-flow and image density of the viewer’s subconscious levels of understanding through the art form of moving pictures. He suggests that there are many concepts that are best explained through images alone that are non-verbal and that to help explain these is best done through the work frame of technology and expanded cinema to utilize in ways only videos, computers, and theaters can portray he calls image libraries or “life-theatres”. He proposes the construction of the “movie-dromes” which are pretty much as he describes a planetarium of images viewed on a dome-like ceiling the audience watches and engages in simply by laying on the ground at it’s walls while it’s projection is displayed in a sort of collage effect. 

This concept and many of his other concepts mentioned in this excerpt are quite fascinating and interesting. Although we have yet to utilize the movie drome to our everyday viewing, we have built similar designs such as this as well as integrated and improve the integration of technology to our everyday life that is best displayed visually rather than within verbal interaction. 


Week 5:

Expanded Cinema: Live Record - Duncan White

The idea of film was at first used for the sake of documenting and rehearsing events within the moment, however, artists have used film and the idea of expanded cinema to record the artistic design of “figures” within a “kinetic theater”. This term was first coined by Carolee Scheemann who saw expanded cinema as a “live image” that captures the essence of the artist’s engagement with the artwork by incorporating the principles of abstract expressionist painting that focused more on socioeconomic concerns, coupling the sense of a collective, physical energy with a re-evaluation of vision and movement. 

Scheemann sought to give the media “flesh” by making it visceral and alive. The media became more than fixed product but an experimental filmmaking and artistic activity that emphasized the cultural process of performance that made expanded cinema seem lively, immediate, an emphasis of primary experience and the directness of viewing. Overall, expanded cinema allowed artist to record their art with the help of technology, using it to their own benefit and projecting it in many different ways that allowed for interaction of the audience or for the sake of performance art, making it static yet lively. The fact that expanded cinema is a process of experimenting with different technological media that allows art to breathe and grow respectively without the limitations of the mainstream uses of traditional media.

Week 7

Line Describing a Cone and Related Films - Anthony McCall

In this article, it describes the work frame and environmental space to a few given artistic works. The first being “Line Describing a Cone” which was the first film to exist in real, three-dimensional space. It was an interactive piece of projector light being displayed on a projected surface with the audience playing a key role in interaction as sculptural pieces within the allotted exhibition time. The artist was amazed by the inconsistent interaction with the piece with some audience members staying only briefly while others stayed from start to finish, each interacting with the piece in their own way whether during the performance piece within the light spectrum against the projected surface or afterwards engaging amongst their peers talking about the piece. The artist spent a great of pre-planning when it came to the structure of the piece, the length of the space from the projector to the projected surface, the exhibition room, the timeframe, the little details involving the projector itself and the size of the cone projecting the light. All of these details were worked into the performance to establish some form of control while the rest was simply interacted on by the audience. 

Long Film for Four Projectors - Anthony McCall

This next piece entitled “Long Film for Four Projectors” was a much longer piece and designed not so much as a theatrical piece but as an installation allowing the audience to come and go as they please. As the project progressed so did temporal length of the piece, adding a new element to the theatrical experience. As the artist worked with time as a main driven point in his work, he used it to his advantage to extend the piece and allowing it room to grow yet “cease to grow as a performance with a perceivable beginning and end”. The gallery space was a huge factor within the work frame of this piece, a large room at least seventh feet in length. It’s content consisted of an even length of film in each projector, at a constant speed within each where it would project through its light an enlarged image onto the screen for as long as 12 hours as the timeframe of the piece grew. 

Anthony McCall’s next two projects continued to show his interest within the projector and the environmental space. His experimentation with the projector with its underlying use as a medium factored in greatly with his artwork. He sought to push the boundaries of film by simply using the projector as a source to project the coded information onto a flat surface. He used the projector beyond its usage as a device and made it part of the art piece itself, using it within the given space and sometimes with multitudes of projectors within the same performance piece. He also establish a new element to the artistic design, time. He used time as a means to help add a factor to the piece, allowing it to expand within length and as an interactive performance piece. Time is something not many artist consider when presenting an art piece with how long it takes to present it to the timeframe of the performance used to engage in it. He revolutionized the idea of both the usage of the projector and the usage of time. 

Week 9:

The Invention and Early Years of Cinema, 1880s-1904

During the 1880s when the idea of cinema and moving pictures first came into existence, it helped establish a new technological revolution within the industrial era, providing a mass-production of easier, simpler ways of providing entertainment to the masses. The preconditions for motion pictures were the scientific and biological discovery of the eye’s capabilities to perceive motions at a relatively rapid rate. After said discovery was established, several optical toys were marketed to give an illusion of movement by using a small number of drawings, each altered somewhat. called the Zoetrope. This was one of the first hand-drawn animation loops provided, all for the sake of optical research. In a sense, this was the first considerable form of the now modernized, digitally rendered form of the GIF.



Other productions that helped mass-produce the use of moving images was the invention of “magic lanterns” to project glass lantern slides. The reinvention of photography was then establish to be presented on a much flexible strip to insert within a projector or camera rapidly. This help revolutionize both photography and filmography.  This also helped with the intermittent mechanism for cameras and projectors, providing a place for each frame to stop and be exposed while being run, such as a shutter passed behind the lens while the filmstrip moved because of the hand-cranked motor. It also help utilize the condition of movement and the idea of motion blur, adding even more devices on cameras to help readjust the quality of the movement for a much clear shot. All of these inventions help revolutionize the way cameras and projectors are used in the future, the production a fast-growing, mass-produced and ever evolving system of moving images. 

More precursors to motion pictures was the idea of using rapidly produced photographs and using them as motion pictures such as taking multiple photographs of a horse running to analyze the movement of their gallops and each picture providing a different frame each but ever evolving into the next. 

Further along in this article of Bordwell’s Invention of Cinema, we look at the ever-growing international fascination and contributions of Europeans also taking a part within the this new media of cinema and motion pictures. This helped produce some more inventions such as Kinetoscope, a peephole device that ran the film around a series of rollers and activated when viewers inserted a coin in a slot. The Lumière Brothers and their contribution to the filming industry, providing a few amazing works of art and most famous invention the projection system that helped make the cinema a commercially viable enterprise internationally and was commissioned to create much smaller, affordable devices than Edison, elegantly designing a little camera, the Cinématographe. The Lumière Cinématographe, a small, portable device used to record everyday movements into films and place on a stand for a much stable performance provided a much easier development of film and camerawork than did many other inventions into play. These contributions each unique and vastly different but ever evolving onto the next helped revolutionize the filming and photography industries that we now thrive on today. The evolutional process of these works help many growing artists and with further technologies make it much more easier and affordable for the viewer. We have grown since then as a society now using film as a means for movies and movie theaters allowing the artists and actors record the movements of images and cinematic, theatrical scenes and stories while the masses or the viewers pay to see. And with the production of digital devices and computers, we have come a long way from hand-held pictures in a Zoetrope or Magic Lanterns and hand-held animations to digital, more easily developed and more affordable 3D animations. We have come a long way since then and within only a little over a century. 

An Aesthetic of Astonishment: Early Film and The (In)Credulous Spectator - Tom Gunning

This article looks at Lumière’s “Arrival of a Train at the Station” and explains the palpable, dangerous affect the cinema’s realism has on its audience. The new artform of cinema not yet experience by the mass viewers, were ignorant and naive when coming into the theater, being introduced for the first time cinema in the making. They faced a physical trauma and undeniable fear as they watch a moving train coming at them as it arrives at the station. Many audience members coward and scream, taking a fight or flight action in their primitive response, fleeing from the auditorium as they watched horror how realistic the cinema can be. 

It further analyzes the spectator to its cinematic experience, Metz believing that the naive viewer, “is still seated beneath the incredulous one, or in his heart.” He further looks at the idea of the spectator wavering between the credulous position of believing the image and the repressed, anxiety-causing, knowledge of its illusion. An inner deception among the mass of spectators still believing in myth and fantasy as part of reality and yet newly introduced to this idea that cinema can achieve far more realistic and frightening representations of everyday perspectives without the intentional harm of the viewer. It intends to help better the spectators well-rounded perspective by allowing them within situations that does not always accomplish positive outlooks. It expands the mind and opens the eye to new experiences without every having experienced them. 

The first projections most likely approached more realistic, life-threatening experiences within its cinematic production, confusing the naive spectator for what is fiction and what is reality. Understandably the realism the cinema provides with such terror can be real to the viewer, offering a sense of being sucked into the experience as many motion pictures do to its viewers. Why even in modern dramas and action-packed battles on the big screen are we susceptible to cinema’s illusionistic grasp. However, during a time where the motion picture experience was still very new to the spectator, the terror of such fiction must have been immense and overwhelming. One can only imagine the terror the viewer must face being introduced to something so new and yet not fully aware of its fictional presence on the screen. 



Week 10: 

The Emergence of Steina - Gerald O’Grady

The usage of recording and surveillance as a source of art with the use of technology is very experimental. Steina, using devices her husband once created for his work and ingeniously manipulating them in her own to use as part of the art piece is brilliant. However, the written structure of this article makes it hard to understand exactly what is trying to be explained. The best I can get out of it is that the instillation of the camera and the video monitor and broadcasting of the artwork seems rather new and ingenious for its time. The writer, O’Grady, is having a difficult time really getting to the point with each paragraph and all of Steina’s work, barely able to grasp an easy explanation or detailing of how Steina is using technology and video recording to her advantage with artwork. However, after viewing a few of Steina’s works and how she manipulates the video image with the usage of sound such as with a violin sort of captures and visual for what O’Grady is trying to get at but at the same time is having a hard time presenting his words into an easy understanding of the point he is trying to make. I feel as if he was able to explain exactly how Steina is using this new media to her advantage for art’s sake, it would be much more invigorating of an article. I understand the gist of this article but not in full detail what is trying to come across through it. 


Expanded Cinema Photo, Post Photo - Jackie Hatfield

In a further, more detailed outlook about Expanded Cinema, the term is better explained as more of an expanded “form” or consciousness rather than something involving film stating, “the current experimental moving image era physically and conceptually transcends traditional media boundaries and artists are evolving new cinematic concepts and intertextual languages, providing an imperative to reconsider and review the under-explored practical histories of the avant-garde”. In this, the term cinema is reevaluated to mean a broad history or to hint at the  “idiosyncratic discourses” of practices that also included spectacle. This term can be best described as exhibition pieces or performances that may or may not disengage the audience within the piece. More is talked about the art of experimentation or the interest of new media and forms of mixed media or a multitude of media within a piece. The accessibility to newer technology such as video expands the flexibility for subsequent developments in interactive media and participatory cinema. Cinema has become a form for not just film and video but also for the means of improving and expanding the framework of art itself in many different new media forms. It utilizes technology to its advantage for the namesake of art and helps artists consider new and more open-ended means for art. 



Week 11: 

Dream Flesh - R. Bruce Elder

Elder looks at Carolee Scheemann and her interests with the body through performance as a conceptual form. Scheemann looks at gender stereotypes and social issues and uses her body as an artform to articulate underline concerns within society. Scheemann focuses on the body quite often with her works of art, displaying her nude body or the bodies of nude women on a stage and performing obscene, considerably deep concerns about how women’s bodies are portrayed within society. She takes note to feminist ideals through the use of her body and flesh through an artistic means. Social nudism had an emerging strain of art that celebrated the body for harboring mysterious, archaic redemptory energies that had a distinctive influence of Germany philosophy of modern social nudism’s practices. It seems that sociology starts playing a huge factor within the 60’s and 70’s of the 20th century, factoring in inequality and the ideal of the male gaze on women’s bodies. The body became an icon for the natural and intended purposes it is pre-designed to do rather than a respective form for living. The body was sexualized and artists felt that further sexualizing it for the sake of art was how one can redefine that line of art and nudity where nudity pushes the boundaries of sex and sexual means. Sexuality and gender start playing a key role within art during this time, the use of art a sort of symbolic medium for gaining respect for the body rather than as a object on display, yet ironically becoming an performance object on display. 

Week 12: 

Digital Divide - Claire Bishop

Claire Bishop questions contemporary artworks negligence of the digital age with the divide of the traditional uses of artistic media with this new media of the digital world and the beneficial relationship between the internet and mass-production of traditional works through digital means. This article looks at the digital age as both a positive and negative respect to that of artwork whether through its production, dissemination, and consumption to its ubiquitous forms, their omnipresence facilitated by the accessibility and affordability of digital cameras and editing software. As she questions contemporary art has been curiously unresponsive to the total upheaval in the labor and leisure inaugurated by the digital revolution. This question she points out furthers her concerns to digital media to the practices and interactions with artwork and its affects to the art world in general. 

Thursday, December 12, 2013

Things we talked about during Nicky's critique

Michael Robinson's "And We All Shine On": https://vimeo.com/8739633

Olafur Eliasson: here

The Waking Life - movie shot in denton and austin

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Resources for starting your own Bathtub Darkroom

Hey everyone! Some in class had asked me to post a few resources for developing film yourself outside of this class, particularly without access to a gang darkroom.

There are lots of resources on the web for this sort of thing, and a handful of communities that can be really useful. I'll list a few links and then remind you of the techniques we've been using.

You should check out the Handmade Film Institute. Their resources page has lots of good information for different kinds of processing. You may want to apply for one of their retreats at some point.

Here's a nice PDF on starting your own DIY film lab.

Now, some of what we've been doing in class is somewhat inaccessible. We'd originally intended to use Eastman/Kodak's high-contrast developer "D-19", but when it wasn't available we substituted "Dektol". Unfortunately, neither are in production, but you should be able to find a developer by Ilford called "Multigrade" developer. This, like Dektol, is a developer for paper photo prints and it should work about the same on 7363. You can also easily get Ilford Fixer, and it's the same as Kodak fixer. I was able to buy these at Garland Camera, and you can also probably find them at Arlington Camera. Don's Used Photo in Dallas is another great resource for all sorts of gear and chemistry.

I haven't tried this place yet, but you can look for these things at Denton Camera Exchange and see what they have. Maybe request they stock some of this stuff if you'll be using it regularly? https://www.facebook.com/dentoncameraexchange

If you really want to be able to use a higher contrast developer like D-19 for even more stark black and white with very little gray, you can find a substitute here, along with lots of other chemicals and oddities: http://stores.photoformulary.com/StoreFront.bok

Remember, if you intend to send your film to a lab at some point, you need to mail it to a lab that actually processes the kind of film you're planning to develop. Many will only do color, and some do color and black and white. Here are a few you might look into:


Sanitary Lab in Dallas - they don't have prices online, so you'll have to contact someone there. Color only.

Color Lab - a great lab based in Maryland. They do B/W and color. Good student discounts.

Yale Film Labs - Color and B/W, based in Burbank Cali. They also do super 8, and you can buy regular 8 film from them.


Tuesday, November 12, 2013

What we played with in class: making a gemwin and gemlist, controlling the pitch of a sawtooth oscillator with motion detection.

another way of having more accurate blob detection without using [pix_background], which can't be kept out of the gem window....

Steina readings


      I liked how both of these readings were so specifically focused on one person. Steina just seemed so innovative. When society was experimenting with sound and video, etc., Steina just seemed to come upon the same elements in a whole new perspective.
     The first reading was really nice, it talked a lot about Steina, her history and her goal and direction as an artist. It wasn't like a complete biography though either, unless it was a biography of the art she produced. It talked more about the different innovations in her work and how those came about or led to new ideas.
    The second paper wasn't necessarily about Steina herself but it talked a lot about her. She was such an influential artist, her work pushing the limits of video and sound, questioning their relationship between each other.

Monday, November 11, 2013

Steina and Jackie Hatfield

Both of the readings as well as watching the film Violin Power, explained the order of the history of Expanded Cinema more completely as a still evolving art. Film, then Electronic,then Digital. And yet each medium combines with each other or continues to experiment with ever changing digital means to continue to create something new. I especially liked Jackie Hatfield's explanation--" that artists were free-flowing individuals experimenting with different kinds of media,and more often than not were working with-and expanding both technologies". ( video and film ). -that's what Steina was doing while her husband was busy creating and programming the waveform--talk about mixing old and new!  As a couple they seem more "present day kind of artists"...combining art and technology--with old and new experiments--rather than more history..
The electronic part is still a bit over my head but I am interested.- Interested especially in how it relates to a new kind of music...technology's music making itself is very much like Steina's cameras "seeing" for themselves. Cool.

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

PD tutorials: Click HERE List of GEM/pd objects + tutorials: Click HERE

Steina Respons.

Its hard enough to come up with ways to artistically rework ways to use a camera in a non conventional way today, let alone doing the same thing with the heavier and bulkier cameras back on the 70s. Thats what really impress me about Staina's work, coming up with work way aged of her time that even now by todays standards we find it as a creative art piece. The fact that she did this with the technological limitation of her time as well just makes it all the more inspiring.

Monday, November 4, 2013

Line describes a cone

this installation is awesome, and it's inspired by Line describing a cone. I'd like to do something like this for my second project, check out this video, but turn the speakers down, it is quite abrasive
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZXx8qnt4MYg

Thursday, October 31, 2013

Week 9 Readings


   The Bordwell reading was very strait forward and basically just gave a history of cinema, talking about what things put it in motion up until the early days of successful motion pictures.
     These readings were very interesting and I actually happen to be learning about this same thing in my Computers in Art class, where they fully buy into the myth of the audience's terror at the film of the train. The Gunning reading talks a lot about the thoughts behind early cinema and is much more thought provoking. It mentions the Lumiere's Arrival of a Train at the Station, and though he doesn't completely deconstruct the myth of the extent of people's reaction to it, ( namely running out of the theatre in terror), he does question it. He talks about the astonishment of the audience not being in fear for their lives but mainly more out of the amazement that such a display could be caught on motion picture. Gunning quotes a Montpellier journalist who says about the Lumieres' projections cause "an excitement bordering on terror." There astonishment was more due to the excitement and curiosity of the medium.
   The Gunning reading was overall good and informative, a little hard to digest at times. I liked getting to read more in depth about the thoughts of viewers and film  makers of that time, rather then just getting cut and dry facts like the Bordwell reading.

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Reading Response on Bordwell & Thompson and T. Gunning

I actually preferred the Bordwell reading with the history of cinema the best. I think both articles point out that times have not changed much since the Victorian age as far as movies being the top entertainment and terror and imagination or astonishment being the favorite subject of those movies.
What I found the most interesting was the fact that Edison's assistant actually took film "out of the box" with his inventions and innovations....cutting the film to 35mm size and punching sprockets influenced the history of cinema to this day..pretty cool...except nobody remembers Dickson's name and everyone knows Edison... considering that Dickson made the best camera and projector for 70mm also keeps him in genius category especially since he no longer worked for Edison at that time...
Favorite new word!! Black Marias!  named after the police paddy wagon -ha!
 And smart people who figured out the "slack" in the film loop was the most important thing in becoming full-length movies...Bravo slackers Latham Group :)

Oh final favs!  Annie Oakley one of first Edison films and Alice Guy, first female filmmaker . And wondering how that filmmaker in Gunning's article got his train shot straight on...without mishap...or did he?

Peppers Ghost

Monday, October 28, 2013

Sound Design experiment on the silent film of Man Ray, le retour à la ra...

week 9 tom gunnn

Reading about the invention of cinema and early cinema is a topic im all to familiar with. But the science part behind it i found super interesting and have always wondered about. It really put into perspective how much thought  was put into the creation of cinema. Tomm gunnings reading reminded me alot of Carloee S. view on cinema and aesthetics. Finding what moves a audience is still a mystery to me, but both speak of cinemas primitive natural reaction to moving image. We are so comfortable with a illusion its mind blowing....
(almost as mind-blowing as a masochist Deborah  Harry)

Tom Gunning response

This read was pretty entertaining, and it really got me thinking abuts the future. It makes me wonder if in our future will mankind invent a new medium that will shock and astonish viewers as intensely as those in 1895 when they saw the first movie projection. I wonder if mankind is even capable of that kind of reaction anymore, or is there's just that can schtick us like that cause either we've seen it all, or we're simply too aware of reality? I imagine what could possibly do this is virtual reality, which is becoming more and more prominent with artist and game designers pushing that medium further. Either way, I think we need these kind reactions now a days, we need a new medium to further explore what humans can make and express.

reading response

I have been watching this series on tcm, and I think it is definitely worth checking out.


http://www.tcm.com/this-month/article/650688|0/The-Story-of-Film-An-Odyssey-Mondays-Tuesdays-in-September.html

week 7

Mccalls cone series is really interesting. I was really confused about the way they were describing them so i had to watch videos to understand them more and since the whole article was essentially him describing the pieces i was confused throughout. But upon watching i was able to take in a better understanding of the pieces and their purposes.  All his peices call for the audience to participate and to become one with it. He describes each member has having their own encounter and experience with the piece which are always the pieces i like.  The thought that the artist puts into their work and how its suppose to make the audience feel is always really interesting to me. Did he decided that after he created the piece? or did he go into it knowing what kind of reaction he wanted from the audience. One thing that he brought up that was different than other artists we have talked about is how important the projector is. Usually we talk about what it is projecting or what it is being projected on but Mccall it seems hold it sacred. Mccall made me realize the projecting of light can evoke alot of  emotion  and it made me view the projector in  a whole new perspective.



http://vimeo.com/29428835

Tuesday, October 22, 2013

So....

I don't want to repeat everything Alex said, but I figure I should post something....

It was explained to us by our former classmate, Alice, who was working on the show that at the beginning, when you first entered the building your picture was taken, and they fingerprinted you. From their computer, they blacked out everything about you that could have been considered sexual.
They even blocked out the female guests necks. There were magazines and black tape on a table as well and it gave the guests the opportunity to censor whatever they wanted (there was not much censored when I looked at it surprisingly)

I wished we had gotten there when it had started but seeing the video in the background while we listened to the last 20 minutes of the discussion was definitely worth the drive.

Going to get some drinks was the best part though :) Andrew (Morehshin's husband) was very impressed(?) with my double major combination: New Media and Mathematics. He told me about some math based art programs I should look up as well as some books.

I didn't get to talk to David Stout as much since he was at the opposite end of the table from me, but just being at the bar with these amazing artists in such a laid-back environment was really mind-blowing and I feel very lucky to have had the opportunity to pick their brains!

I would love to be able to do this more often!

Monday, October 21, 2013

Aurora Light Show

The light show was such a cool experience, very diverse while incorporating light and New Media. I really liked getting to see New Media in a setting outside of academics.. It was interesting to see some of these displays and know that I've used some of the programs they used to execute their installations. I watched a small band play in a performance hall with a curtain of what looked like black spheres in front of them, the spheres were close to each other yet far enough apart that you could see behind them to the band. After a few minutes the curtain lit up and a silhouetted figure of light walked across the curtain. Figures continued to walk across the curtain, going along with the slow but urban feel that the band produced. The effect was lovely yet simple, I’m curious if they might have used Isadora or something similar to create it. Along with Isadora I feel like I could pinpoint other programs like Processing and things I am currently learning to use being used to produce these successful works of art.

                The show consisted of large scale projections such as on the side of buildings like the Omni hotel and smaller displays such as the ones on walls under the The Cathedral Shrine of the Virgin of Guadalupe. A lot of the art was very interactive which I think even drew non artists in. It was really encouraging to see these pieces, to see the achievability and success of my chosen art field. 

Sunday, October 20, 2013

" Censorship and Propaganda – In the US and Abroad" and an evening in Dallas with Morehshin and company

Centraltrack is a small gallery. The State fair traffic was a mess for miles all around. Right on par with our signature style, Pippins and I arrived an hour and a half late. We payed a woman who I'm pretty sure was on crystal meth $15 to park under an overpass and walked into a surprisingly intimate Q&A session between a panel of participants (all dressed in black) including Morehshin and perhaps 30 guests. We stood in the back and I watched the projected film looping on the front wall, it was a recording of Olympic events, with the athletes blocked over (poorly) by black sensor bars. I was watching it for while, thinking that Morehshin had added the censor bars to the footage herself. I was wrong, it was the publicly broadcasted Olympic footage as seen in Iran. It's funny, but also it makes you think about the degree of censorship that people are living with. Morehshin's work always makes me feel so American, that's the best way to describe it; lucky, then self-absorbed, small-minded, then oblivious. The Q&A wrapped up, there was no applause, which made me feel unsettled. I offered to help clean up, but Pippins and I mostly just stood around like idiots. Morehshin came over and hugged us, and told us to stick around. We talked with a few people in the gallery, then Morehshin, her husband, David Stout, and their two friends invited Pippins and I to go to a bar with them. We all walked together down exhibition avenue and Morehshin saw one of the flyers she had handed out on the ground and we stopped so she could take a picture of it. I told her that I got written up at work for unprofessional hair, and she smiled and said "your hair is being censored." I agreed. " If you were a man," she said," I bet they wouldn't care if your hair was messy." We all went into the bar and sat at the table farthest to the back. Nobody talked about the show, I think they were all just tired from setting it up all day. Morehshin asked me about my 16mm film project, and I told her that the camera I bought off ebay had come loaded with KodaChrome film from 1963, and that when I tried to develop it, I had ended up with a splotchy scratched mottled mess in black and white. Everyone at the table laughed and said "well, that's your project! Work with that!" Andrew, Morehshin's husband, asked me what I wanted to do for a living, and I told him that I didn't want to be an artist on my own, I wanted to work for a corporation, so I could have some guaranteed income. He told me that he expects his students to achieve more than just working a job at Pixar or wherever. Then he told Pippins and I to learn java, html, and max programming immediately, and to buy ourselves webpages and to make extracurricular projects constantly. I told him that I was considering moving in with my parents so I could afford to buy a nice mac, he said that was stupid, and that 30 years ago people were building 3d models on computers less powerful than my cell phone and that any limitations I felt I had due to a lack of technological means were all in my head. We listened to David Stout's stories, he's pretty funny. Morehshin invited Pippins and I to come sit in on one of her classes at UTD sometime, and we told her to come visit our class. That was the night out with new media. I liked what I saw of the show, and the group has given me some ideas for future projects of my own.

Monday, October 14, 2013

VideoFest 2013

May I first say that I am so happy that Videofest exists. I think it is an essential tool in the continuation of independent and underground film. When I got to the MAC on Thursday night, I was suprised how few people were around, but I saw Stout hanging around outside and that was cool. Later at the Alamo draft house, the show was a little dissapointing due to the performing artist being sick. Most of the kids I talked with after the show said that they expected more, and where underwhelmed by the Dusty Stacks of Mom performance. I feel like Videofest is not acheiving it's full potential, I want to be a part of this, and I want to help Videofest grow.

Monday, September 30, 2013

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

Week 5 Readings

I noticed that these readings seemed to focus a great deal on the reversal of viewer and artist;
"activation of the spectator"
"viewer and artist are interchangeable"
etc.

I think it is interesting to now know when this idea of interactive art was first conceptualized. However, I feel that many of the works mentioned did not exactly portray this idea to its full capacity. Carollee Shneeman was given credit for using film as her primary medium, rather than a recording device of her performances. I can understand her work being an example of the statement "Direct use of body is a vital aspect of expanded cinema," but I must disagree with the statement that she didnt use film as merely a recording device.

I just feel that the concept of "kinetic theater" was a little over credited. It's neat and cool, sure. but do I think that its such an incredible break through in the expanded cinema to be considered a movement from "painterly" films to "kinetic" films. No. not really. That was just my interpretation of the reading though.

In short I just think that the idea of viewer and artist being interchangeable had not fully reached its potential at this time and should not be stated as such. I do feel these artists were the beginning inspiration of that though.

Not an image of Death

I got say it very refreshing to read someone not looking at the transition from film to digital as a tragic death of a medium, but a new role for it to play. Each time I see or here about the art pieces Walley describes, it always with this air of film being stamped out by the soulless digital age. Granted film is becoming more and more technically irrelevant, I don't feel there is the complete and tragic loss with the transition to digital, its just the way time works. Thats why I'm glad to read Walley's view of these film art pieces as representations of the death of a medium, but an expansion of it.  

week 5

I think what these two articles  were implying was moving beyond the concrete idea of expanded cinema. Of course thats what we have been talking about the whole time but what carollee discusses with kinetic theater is making the performance more of a visceral experience that moves the audience beyond the celluloid images. Something that enhances all your senses and is a true expression of the artists. the article with john spoke of how working with film and film projection is still relevant to this day. He states that it opens up   a whole new meaning of work in the materialist vain than in the digital vain which i agree with.  Working with film is alot more hands on and personal. it creates a experience for the audience that takes into account the effort it put into creating this sort of art form. For the Artist working with film in the digital age its truly about expressing yourself and creating a unique and personal work of art.

Monday, September 23, 2013

Duncan White and Jonathan Walley Readings

While Duncan White reminds us that "as reality and its representation take on equal status they offer us a multiple of perspectives" ...he uses an Andy Warhol film of Edie Sedgwick appearing to be in a conversation with a televised version of herself...--this can be done successfully with video technology. ( Lacy and I did a version of this for a video final project)... Duncan ends with merging thoughts with Jonathan Walley about the value of film in "unfixing the stable qualities of traditional cinema".
Jonathan Walley is blunt---Video does it for you, and Film you do it yourself. And he adds "raising mechanical error to an artistic value"--in other words...glitch it up. which perversely restores the meaning of film..."vitality in a digital age".....I like that.--old school glitch restoring film to a new artistic height. I actually agree here with Jonathan Adams last post about using this in some new ways to restore a bankrupt culture to some new political awareness...etc...Maybe maybe...pretty sure we've explored the outer body plenty,-- time for some telepathic art projecting directly in your brain. ha. I saw a documentary about how our brains in fact put out an image- when concentrating on visualization of something- that can be picked up as an image by a brain scan.. Freaky to know our minds can be read/ scanned to see what pictures are in our heads. Keep it abstract people, lol.

Thursday, September 19, 2013

There was an exchange at one point in the interview that made me shudder and I had to read it a few times:
CAROLEE: We go to the theatre in search of inner realities because
of the bankruptcy of the myths and conventions we're used to
dealing with in everyday life.
GENE: Perhaps in the near future, the whole process of living will be
in this active seeking out of experiences

I found this pretty fascinating and I feel that this could be very true in a lot of ways within experimental cinema. Looking at the works of Belson and Brackhage, I feel there could definitely be notions of "therapy." I feel this idea is something that could be applied to all film in some form or fashion, however. I think that we are bankrupt as a culture and I think that most people are onto that whether they're completely conscious of it or not and I feel that in bringing expanded cinema to its greatest heights, we, as artists should expand on these psychoanalysis and political principles and use it as a force to be reckoned with throughout society.

Also a bit off topic but I think these two bands do a pretty wicked job of intermedia musical performance:


Godspeed! You Black Emperor has a person running several 16mm projectors while the band performs, overlaying and moving around and switching roles of film, its really quite a performance in an of itself.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7xbADHyv8k

The Residents also do a lot of really cool, bizarre performance, projections, intermedia, music, music videos, etc. that folks should check out.

Wednesday, September 18, 2013

Intermedia: A new perspective

I think the main emphasis of Intermedia is pushing boundaries. In the “Cerebrum” physical societal norms were slowly lifted away, leaving the audience with only each other, their own lightly shrouded naked bodies and their senses. I thought it was interesting as how when so many elements, such a clothes and privacy, etc., are removed that this Cerebrum was not devoid of reaction from the audience but actually encouraged interaction and heightened the senses.
                My first initial thought after reading this was “How does this relate to cinema or ever art in general?” That’s just it though, I think Youngblood is trying to get us to open out eyes to different forms of art and how engaging it can be. Here the audience becomes the art, not just a part of it but they embody it. The audience gets to be a piece of the art, experiencing and observing it all at the same time.

Similarly “Multi-Projection Environments” pushes boundaries as well, that is the physical boundaries of the screen. Both types of art are questioning the relationship between the visual and sensory aesthetics of art and the audience’s role.

Tuesday, September 17, 2013

Intermedia Examples

John Cage - HPSCHD Soundtrack to Vortex concerts Carolee Schneemann on UbuWeb Gibson, Recoder, and Block

Sandra Gibson, Luis Recoder, Olivia Block from 25 FPS on Vimeo.

Bruce McClure

Bruce McClure from 25 FPS on Vimeo.

Kerry Laitala - The Color Red Bleeds Blue

OneTake #8 - A Few Moments with Kerry Laitala & John Davis at the Other Cinema Benefit Show from Chromavision on Vimeo.

"The Color Red Bleeds Blue"-Documentation of an Expanded Cinema Work By Kerry Laitala from Kerry Laitala on Vimeo.

Kyle Evans Phil Solomon

AMERICAN FALLS (OPENING SECTION) - DV, stereo from Phil Solomon on Vimeo.

Intermedia -Predictions and Myths

I have to say that we are already in Youngblood's predictive world and beyond, though some of the reasons he gives for past intermedia art being about myth I disagree with. Like the riots of the sixties being linked to a "body theatre"that they needed to represent physically... I think flash mobs are about that. But so much of the first part of the article has come true. Virtual environments, interactive video games and Disneyland has a 3D animation process that did in fact hit me in the eye!  I reacted to a cartoon bug that hit me in the head! I felt its wings, the buzz in my ear...was completely sucked into an animation environment. We do have films the size of a wristwatch, but when he poses the idea that we will communicate on very high psychic levels of neurological reasoning...I think not. Look at our fake reality shows engrossing a nation, people somehow still prefer Duck Dynasty over Occupy anything.We are internationalizing art though--maybe artists will break through the boundaries through intermedia.

Monday, September 16, 2013

Artist as Ecologist response

Wasn't quite sure what Youngblood was getting at with this part of his book. I understand his idea of artist interacting, and adding to the surrounding man finds himself in, but not sure what he saw for the future for it is? It kind of sounded like that at some point artist and scientist will advanced so much that they would be able to virtually create anything their minds can think of. If this is what he's saying, then I am looking forward to the future.  

Intermedia

The most interesting idea in this section of expanded cinema for me is the idea of "Filmstage" I think this idea has not been used enough, nor has it recognized it's full potential. I'd like to see more films that have a live/ interactive accompaniment. Here are links to all the current examples i could find of Filmstage. You guys please add more if you can think of any.

Live performance supplementing film of the Rocky Horror Picture Show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VpgYgH9_MU

Depeche Mode- Devotional
A performance filmed by Anton Corbijn

University of Hull drama and technology performance


At one point, Paul Mccarthy's Caribbean Pirates had a live component but it was only performed as a whole a few times, and apparently not recorded. 

computers and blues interactive film 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwAvNRv7J34


 

Friday, September 13, 2013

INTERMEDIA

Im glad we are finally talking more about more artists and their installations. This reading kind of made me a little sad because i will never be able to see most of these installations, but i must say this is the easiest read we have had to do and it didnt introduce concepts i haven't thought about before.(Except for how certain artist went about creating what they did and the methods they used) So it was nice just reading about artists  and their interpretations of their art and how and why they did the things they did. I am hyper aware of the concept of artists as ecologists though i never thought of it in those terms. It was nice to read about artist who are trying to evoke their audience with out being a spectacle.  I like how in the Carolee interview she talks of bombarding the audience with these images and multiple visual elements  because they are so use to the narrative structure. Ive brainstormed a number of installations that resemble some of the ones that i read about in the text and it gave me a new perspective on my ideas and how i can transcend what i am doing with my art to create a entirely body transcendent experience. Im a huge fan of Barbabra hammer and the other day in class you showed us something from the Tate or MOMO but i saw in the you tube suggestions Barbra hammer on the right and immediately speeded home to watch her installation. Anyway, i think she has some good things to say about the audience and the environment she wants to put her audience in.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MLobRZk4SF8

Synaesthetic Cinema: The End of Drama

Synaesthetic Cinema is a really interesting concept that i feel defiantly ties into the the thoughts and ideals that were being circulated at the time. I thought the quote "all the world is not a stage, its a TV documentary" was really profound. We are constantly exposed to the human condition on tv , observing these images told to us in this narrative structure that is immersed in ideology reflects how we go about our lives. This creates a 'thought loop' that never encourages the masses to think outside of the box of the ideology soaked images in an understandable structural  format.This separates our experience from the real human experience. I think its interesting what cinema-verite would do if it was consumed and understood by a mass audience. If we viewed and if all moving image was produced with the intent to capture unstylized reality how would shape our reality. But i think potentially it could have the same effects as tv just expanding our contentiousness in a different way. If we capture reality isn't our reality still caught  up in ideology? so wouldn't that just re manifest itself when we view the human condition through a less structured more artfull lens? just a thought.

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

Synaesthetic Cinema


"Synaesthetic cinema transcends the notion of reality. It doesn't "chop the world into little fragments." ..... The notion of universal unity and cosmic simultaneity is a logical result of the psychological effects of the global communications network."t As literal as this sounds this reminds of the social media that completely absorbs our lives today. I wonder if he would be approving of it because it is essentially a level of global communication that does not in fact have any kind of physical representation. The concept of communicating with people through the internet, the television, radio, etc. all transcend reality. But then I wonder if he would completely disagree with this form of global communication since it is essential owned and operated by corporations, which may be considered as some form of governmental control. It is this idea that makes me think that perhaps the ideals of Synaesthetic Cinema are not constrained to that of film and art. doesn't "chop the world into little fragments," an


Synaesthetics

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8IxeroqZSuo

Monday, September 9, 2013

Youngblood on Synaesthetic Cinema

Wow what a mind...Youngblood seems like he has taken all the modern art movements and deepest psychological theories, and critical arguments-added straight shots of Minimalism and shot it out of a lens of New Media for us to express our individual consciousness through cinematic film. And yet I think I get it or at least part of it...I think his writing is endlessly quotable--combining physics and art...Chaos is order on another level--yes. Technoanarchy!  And all thanks to television there are no more secrets or words to be creative. lol...we always knew it.. It does feel like we are already there, layering images of past, present, future in nonlinear personal expressions.. ooh again with the physics..elegant simplicity...I like that. Abstraction that renders fiction obsolete. This guy can write!
The part that really feels like polar opposites in art is the part of technique that excludes the theatrical while trying to evoke emotion from our archetypal consciousness' ...all of them...collective, personal...
I just hope my film is interesting.

Sunday, September 8, 2013

End of Drama Response

This reading had a new, and somewhat dark look at tv in a way I didn't think of. As he said, TV captures everything that happens in every day life, thus secrete can no longer be kept, or at least they're much harder to do so. I'll like to add that internet has only amplified this effect, and will only increased in that.
Youngblood saw this as mankind's conscious pooling together, which has its own benefits, but I can't help but think of this as constant surveillance from a government. The whole "no secrets being kept" thing can be used in benefitual way, but this isn't a perfect world, so its most likely going to be used for selfish ends. Hopefully though that can change over the future, where humans become more in tuned to the technology as Youngblood describes.

Friday, September 6, 2013

Save the New Age. Real change please.

  What he discusses in the second section I can get behind - for the most part. It's painfully obvious that he comes from New Age perspective (he even says it himself). Which is great in so many philosophical respects. Radical evolution, great. Connections of people around the globe, awesome. Away with the old and in with the new, down with it. I agree with his overall sentiment, but I think what he fails to address is essentially what brought us to the corporate owned state of things today and what was, in my opinion the failure of the entire "hippie" phenomenon. While he notes that commercial entertainment has in large part taken over our consciousness he fails to take on the notion of modern capitalism and its implications, which is why essentially his ideas never blossomed, in my humble opinion. The ideas he brought forward as to his vision of what media should look like are pretty beautiful, however as is seen throughout American history, whenever something is given to the people for free, the second massive corporations see a possibility of profit in the concept, forget about it. That is, unless it is protected with through and through from their ever growing reach into all aspects of life. Without addressing capitalism's reach, his dreams will never come true and media will never truly become free. The ideas of seeing things in a common artistic language throughout the world via television, internet, etc. are very much real - except for the purpose of selling us the newest thing. Long story short, the language used that at times sounds as if it could have come out of the mouth of an intellectual new age-er standing around on Fry St. can just go ahead and render itself irrelevant in my book.
 

Monday, September 2, 2013

Ordering Film

Your first project is required to be shot and projected on film. This means you're going to need to get your hands on some film. There are a handful of options for ordering film, and it doesn't necessarily have to be expensive, depending on what you need. Here are a few options:

Kodak - http://motion.kodak.com/motion/Products/index.htm

Kodak is still around and still the largest producer of motion picture film. Take a look at their camera films if you're planning on shooting negative and having a lab process it and make a print (ask if you're not sure what you need.) If you plan on processing your own film and making your own print, look into their print films and post production films, particularly a high-contrast positive film called 7363 (often referred to as "Hi-Con"). You may also choose to use a fine grain print stock called 7302. We'll work in class with these. If you want to shoot color, you're going to be stuck with shooting negative.

To order from Kodak, you'll need to call one of their sales offices. Their LA office has been the most helpful to me most recently. You can call them here: 1-800-621-FILM (3456) Tell them what number stock you want and how many feet. Send them an image of your student ID for an educational discount. You can save money by buying 400ft rolls and spooling down to 100ft spools to fit our Bell and Howell cameras. Go in on an order with fellow students to save money.

ORWO - http://www.orwona.com/

Orwo is a German company that has just recently started selling film stock in the US. They have a great variety of black and white negative stocks that are similar to discontinued Kodak stocks. They also have an easy online order system on their website. If you want a little flexibility with exposure and a really beautiful black and white print, shooting one of these stocks and sending it to a lab for printing will be a great option, though perhaps a little more pricey than processing yourself.

AGFA - http://www.agfa.com/sp/global/en/internet/main/solutions/cine/index.jsp

Agfa still makes a couple of stocks. I haven't tried ordering them, but you could give it a shot if you're really curious.

Vanderbeek writes of the ways in which we commonly express ideas and the way we use that expression to interpret the world, to grow within it. He writes "...the world hangs by a thread of verbs and nouns. Language and culture semantics are as explosive as nuclear energy." I think this hits the nail on the head when we talk about the "purpose" of art and of finding the truest forms of expression, because when we do this effectively I think that we can transcend languages, national boundaries, cultures and even time periods. Vanderbeek suggests that we as artists create "a new world language... that we invent a non-verbal international picture language." He goes on to detail a number of ways this can be done scientifically, however I believe it can be argued that this has been done in a number of ways, which maybe accounted for by the rise of the internet but when I watch a German art film, read a comic book from South America,  look at a piece of Japanese street art, I feel that this is being done in very interesting ways.

Expanded enema. Week 2

 From what I could understand  in the reading I belive that both articles coincide with one another. Youngblood offers a theory and critic on the direction society is heading towards (what I gathered from his overall overview of his book) and Vanderbeek offers a solution of sorts.In my theory I attempted to combine the two because Vanderbeek speaks of Expanded cinema as a use of communication and Youngbood speaks of cinema as a way to expand our consciousness and how can we expand our minds without communication. Vanderbeek explains that we have lost emotional comprehension of technology and the cultural intercom will be an emotional experience moving art and life closer. This coincides with Youngbloods theory that we will reach a point  in our evolution when the concept of reality will no longer exist because i feel If we were to learn via Vanderbeeks culture intercom our concept of reality will diminished because one,when that sort of technology arises it will be used against us and two, we are learning about our lives via images and sounds. Dont get me wrong, images and sounds are a vary intrinsic part of our modern life and like Youngblood said cinema is  in fact our lives but my concern with this idea of a picture languge and constently being subjected to them how the governments will use this as a tool to  control the masses. Instead of seeing a Practical Utopian or a society where artists will deal with the world as a work of art, all i envision  is a brainwashed dystopian future similar to THX1138 but instead of pills, people are being controlled by images and every form of creativity is banned. (here is see Alex from a clock work orange with his eyes forced open) Of course though in our current state of living we are already brianwashed by television images and both authors are theorizing how in fact we can create art in a capitalist society that kills creativity. Both authors speak of  how technology will evolve art and realized in their current time that people were disconnected from cinema. Their theory's predated the internet and living in the future with the sort of advanced technology they were getting at we are still all very disconnected from cinema. I fell like in the reading they were preoccupied on how the artist will advance with technology which is true but there is still creative room for the artist to not be on the forefront of technology.
-Alli

Reding responses for week 2



Preface
from
Expanded Cinema -
Gene Youngblood,

Unite art and life, make what’s inside your head-outside your head. That’s the quest.  I agree. I can't really think of anything to add to that, other than that I found this article a while back.... check it out. 


Culture: Intercom –
Stan Vanderbeek

I can’t imagine 1966. I hope Vanderbeek is still alive, because I feel like his dream of sharing media on a global scale is here, I didn’t find any specific reason for why he thought this mass sharing of media would bring world peace, maybe because it could unify the world under one set of ideas, or by sharing a common experience?